There has been a lot of talk recently about companies not acknowledging job applications - let alone feeding back. We understand how frustrating this is,... Read more
There has been a lot of talk recently about companies not acknowledging job applications - let alone feeding back. We understand how frustrating this is, especially in these tough times and we want to review what we can do to help.
How can we persuade employers that small actions here can make a big difference? How can we use collective force to stamp out this bad practice? In short what can The TM be doing to help change the culture?
Over the years we have built various tools to facilitate feedback. We've been fighting this battle for a while!
From the manage jobs tool within their account, recruiters can select all those unsuccessful candidates and respond to all in one go. We even auto fill their 'respond all' email with a standard reply to make that process easier and faster for them, whilst giving them the choice to personalise if they prefer. We tried stopping recruiters posting another job until they had fed back on the first, although that has been difficult to enforce and to be fair to the recruiters it is often something that is not practical especially when they are crewing mulitple jobs at a time.
One of our ideas is to send more regular email reminders embedding easy shortlist or reject options. We've been talking about site modifications and mandatory options versus gentle persuasion. Can we run reports and celebrate the companies with the best feedback records we are wondering? Is there a way of using gamification to celebrate best practice?
But first off we'd love to garner YOUR thoughts. We want YOU to feedback to us. Tell us in the comments IF and HOW you have been affected by the lack of feedback and any ideas you might have for what could be done.
How can we persuade employers that small actions here can make a big difference? How can we use collective force to stamp out this bad practice? In short what can The TM be doing to help change the culture?
Over the years we have built various tools to facilitate feedback. We've been fighting this battle for a while!
From the manage jobs tool within their account, recruiters can select all those unsuccessful candidates and respond to all in one go. We even auto fill their 'respond all' email with a standard reply to make that process easier and faster for them, whilst giving them the choice to personalise if they prefer. We tried stopping recruiters posting another job until they had fed back on the first, although that has been difficult to enforce and to be fair to the recruiters it is often something that is not practical especially when they are crewing mulitple jobs at a time.
One of our ideas is to send more regular email reminders embedding easy shortlist or reject options. We've been talking about site modifications and mandatory options versus gentle persuasion. Can we run reports and celebrate the companies with the best feedback records we are wondering? Is there a way of using gamification to celebrate best practice?
But first off we'd love to garner YOUR thoughts. We want YOU to feedback to us. Tell us in the comments IF and HOW you have been affected by the lack of feedback and any ideas you might have for what could be done.
Green: Responds to 70%> of applicants
Amber: Responds to between 30% > 70% of applicants received
Red: Responds to less than 30% of applicants
Hard to enforce anything too stringent as making using this service unattractive to a company wouldn't help any of us, but would be interesting if a bit of open statistical public shaming might give them some impetus to do things better...
Enforce this sentence as mandatory for all employers.
https://youtu.be/vC6nGZ-nKrU?si=tLqw3wcgfsMVbF_b
I couldn’t imagine anything worse than waiting to see if I was successful for a job, getting an email from the company, only to find out it’s a pat on the head “we have seen you” and that’s it.
That’s even more frustrating. It’s a waste of employers time. It’s a waste of my dopamine.
If you’re the sort of person that needs constant reassurance then maybe an industry as volatile as TV isn’t for you. There are worse practices to be focusing on.
If employers are going to add constructive feedback - I can totally get behind that.
But realistically that’s not going to happen and it’s unfair to put that burden on a company receiving 100’s of applications.
Apply for the job, then forget about it, is the best advice.
I hear that. And in life unfair things happen. I don’t know how healthy it is in the longterm to encourage people to have constant reassurance.
If people want that, there are other careers they can navigate to. But ultimately every choice in life, every job we take, will have a negative aspect attached to it.
I wonder… Who has actually got jobs via TM applications in the last 18months? What are the statistics… that would be really useful to know. How many applicants for a PD role? Was the final candidate chosen via a TM application? Just knowing that would actually help expose what TM is worth, and to what extent the industry is working its “I know someone who knows someone” and “Let me hire the exact same team from last year to be on the safe side” mechanisms (from which admittedly we have all benefitted at one point or another).
There was a comment from someone on FB recently who'd received the generic thanks but no thanks email on TM recently, but could see that their CV hadn't been opened - it just made the process more crushing. In reality that would be the situation for a lot of applicants, especially in the current climate where even more CVs than usual are being received.
Ultimately for me, it sets a 'tone' for the culture across the industry: "You're all disposable, count yourselves lucky if you're selected, shut up, don't complain, if we click our fingers you better come running." etc etc
Freelancers don't feel that sense of respect or appreciation - how one words a job post or responds to an application can really dial the volume of morale up or down.
Transparency through the process solves the problem.
And would there be implications to showing 'number of applicants' to a job?
Plus - I don't think I've actually gained a job via Talent Manager since joining. It's all been through FB closed groups, Talented People or someone has recommended me.